Next week, we will look into how institutional models, both those with and without funding, have impacted CUNY. These may be considered non-traditional models, but because of its non-traditional manner are more students being impacted? Truly think about how programs at CUNY work, why they work, and what makes them a success. What do you wish you could see?
Below are the readings we will discuss, as well as some optional media if you’re interested:
- David Rivera and Kevin Nadal -The Intersection of Queer Theory and Empirical Methods: Visions for the Center for LGBTQ Studies and Queer Studies (Link)
- CUNY Digital History Archive (Take a look into the archives of CLAGS, Medgar Evers College, and Hostos Community College, or anything else that you like!)
- Exploring College Students’ Identification with an Organizational Identity for Serving Latinx Students at a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) and an Emerging HSI” (Link)
- CUNY Receives $10 Million Gift from Mellon Foundation to Boost Racial and Pandemic-Related Efforts (Link)
- Optional: Stories of struggle: histories of childcare activism at CUNY (Link)
Consider the following questions:
- What can we learn from these institutional and semi institutional models? Where are the failure points? Points of tension?
- How has the CUNY community resisted or failed to resist the given institutionalism?
- What does community control look like in the context of CUNY?
- What importance does funding have in the non-traditional sense? Does it matter where funding originates?
- In what ways have implemented programs supported or failed their students?